<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 586 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450805</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed SBI&#039;s application seeking extension until 30 June 2024 for disclosing Electoral Bond details. The Court directed SBI to disclose purchase and redemption information by close of business on 12 March 2024. The case involved constitutional validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme and Finance Act 2017 amendments affecting political party funding disclosure under citizens&#039; right to information. ECI was ordered to publish on its official website the information previously supplied to the Court during proceedings. The extension application was rejected despite SBI&#039;s argument that matching contributor information across separate data systems was time-consuming.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 586 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450805</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed SBI&#039;s application seeking extension until 30 June 2024 for disclosing Electoral Bond details. The Court directed SBI to disclose purchase and redemption information by close of business on 12 March 2024. The case involved constitutional validity of the Electoral Bond Scheme and Finance Act 2017 amendments affecting political party funding disclosure under citizens&#039; right to information. ECI was ordered to publish on its official website the information previously supplied to the Court during proceedings. The extension application was rejected despite SBI&#039;s argument that matching contributor information across separate data systems was time-consuming.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>