<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450803</link>
    <description>Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory for commercial suits where no urgent interim relief is sought, and the urgent relief exception does not apply in such a case. A claimed prior attempt at mediation was insufficient because no mediation report showed failure of mediation; materials only indicated discussions of compromise before another court, which was distinguishable from mediation under the authorised mechanism. Because the suit was instituted without compliance with the pre-institution mediation requirement, rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC followed. Exemption from pre-institution mediation was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450803</link>
      <description>Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory for commercial suits where no urgent interim relief is sought, and the urgent relief exception does not apply in such a case. A claimed prior attempt at mediation was insufficient because no mediation report showed failure of mediation; materials only indicated discussions of compromise before another court, which was distinguishable from mediation under the authorised mechanism. Because the suit was instituted without compliance with the pre-institution mediation requirement, rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC followed. Exemption from pre-institution mediation was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>