<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1490 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312909</link>
    <description>Conviction for criminal breach of trust, cheating, falsification of accounts and criminal misconduct was set aside because the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt. The record showed inconsistencies about the alleged insufficiency of funds, withheld ledger material, and no proof of pecuniary loss, prior conspiracy, or personal gain. On the fixed-deposit allegation, the depositor, being the best witness, was not examined and had made no complaint against the appellant. The evidence, including letters relied on by the appellant and interest paid from a personal account, created suspicion only and did not support a sustainable conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 17:53:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1490 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312909</link>
      <description>Conviction for criminal breach of trust, cheating, falsification of accounts and criminal misconduct was set aside because the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt. The record showed inconsistencies about the alleged insufficiency of funds, withheld ledger material, and no proof of pecuniary loss, prior conspiracy, or personal gain. On the fixed-deposit allegation, the depositor, being the best witness, was not examined and had made no complaint against the appellant. The evidence, including letters relied on by the appellant and interest paid from a personal account, created suspicion only and did not support a sustainable conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>