https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312894 The Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1976 was treated as validly abolishing Mitakshara coparcenary and substituting tenancy in common, so the coparcenary regime ceased after the State Act commenced. On that basis, succession to a deceased coparcener's share was held not to fall under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which concerns coparcenary interest, but under Section 8 as intestate succession to a male Hindu's defined share, with Class I heirs taking accordingly. Claims for damages, eviction and injunction also failed because the parties were co-owners with defined rights, and the dismissals below were affirmed. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:49:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312894 The Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1976 was treated as validly abolishing Mitakshara coparcenary and substituting tenancy in common, so the coparcenary regime ceased after the State Act commenced. On that basis, succession to a deceased coparcener's share was held not to fall under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which concerns coparcenary interest, but under Section 8 as intestate succession to a male Hindu's defined share, with Class I heirs taking accordingly. Claims for damages, eviction and injunction also failed because the parties were co-owners with defined rights, and the dismissals below were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312894