https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312881 The Karnataka HC held that landowners whose property was acquired through preliminary notification issued after 01.01.2014 under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 are entitled to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The court rejected contentions that compensation should be calculated under the 1966 Act, noting that the acquisition notification itself stated compensation would be paid under the 2013 Act. The court emphasized that differential compensation standards cannot be applied to similarly situated landowners, citing Article 14 protection against discrimination. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312881 The Karnataka HC held that landowners whose property was acquired through preliminary notification issued after 01.01.2014 under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 are entitled to compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The court rejected contentions that compensation should be calculated under the 1966 Act, noting that the acquisition notification itself stated compensation would be paid under the 2013 Act. The court emphasized that differential compensation standards cannot be applied to similarly situated landowners, citing Article 14 protection against discrimination. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312881