https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312876 A special acquisition statute that vests land in the State on publication of the final notification and provides its own compensation mechanism is treated as a self-contained code. On that basis, the absence of an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 does not trigger deemed lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court also held that the minutes of the Advisory Committee could not be treated as a binding consent determination because consent to the fixed compensation was not established. The acquisition therefore did not lapse, the quashing order was set aside, and compensation was directed to be determined under the special statute. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312876 A special acquisition statute that vests land in the State on publication of the final notification and provides its own compensation mechanism is treated as a self-contained code. On that basis, the absence of an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 does not trigger deemed lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court also held that the minutes of the Advisory Committee could not be treated as a binding consent determination because consent to the fixed compensation was not established. The acquisition therefore did not lapse, the quashing order was set aside, and compensation was directed to be determined under the special statute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312876