https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312874 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was considered appropriate where the accused had spent over three years in custody, had no other criminal involvement, and the trial was progressing slowly with only a small part of the prosecution evidence recorded. The Court treated the prolonged incarceration and likely delay in trial as sufficient grounds to avoid further detention, noting that the Supreme Court had granted bail in comparable cases on similar facts. On that basis, continued custody was found unnecessary and regular bail was granted. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312874 Regular bail under the NDPS Act was considered appropriate where the accused had spent over three years in custody, had no other criminal involvement, and the trial was progressing slowly with only a small part of the prosecution evidence recorded. The Court treated the prolonged incarceration and likely delay in trial as sufficient grounds to avoid further detention, noting that the Supreme Court had granted bail in comparable cases on similar facts. On that basis, continued custody was found unnecessary and regular bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312874