https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312869 Karnataka HC dismissed petitions challenging land acquisition under KIAD Act, 1966 after enactment of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners argued Chapter VII of KIAD Act became void post-2013 Act and sought declaration against acquisition notifications. Court held KIAD Act remains valid special legislation for industrial development under State List Entry 24, distinct from central land acquisition law. Both Acts can co-exist as they serve different purposes - KIAD Act for industrial establishment, 2013 Act for land acquisition compensation. Board's undertaking to provide compensation as per 2013 Act addressed petitioners' grievance regarding lower compensation under KIAD Act. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312869 Karnataka HC dismissed petitions challenging land acquisition under KIAD Act, 1966 after enactment of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners argued Chapter VII of KIAD Act became void post-2013 Act and sought declaration against acquisition notifications. Court held KIAD Act remains valid special legislation for industrial development under State List Entry 24, distinct from central land acquisition law. Both Acts can co-exist as they serve different purposes - KIAD Act for industrial establishment, 2013 Act for land acquisition compensation. Board's undertaking to provide compensation as per 2013 Act addressed petitioners' grievance regarding lower compensation under KIAD Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312869