https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312868 Successive bail applications under Section 439 CrPC were rejected where the applicants relied on parity, alleged weakness in medical evidence, and claimed change in circumstances. The Court held that parity was unavailable because the co-accused had been granted bail on distinct medical and age-related grounds, not on a comparable factual basis. It also held that disputed questions about whether primary evidence had been adduced and whether the medical testimony proved fracture could not be conclusively examined at the bail stage, as those matters belonged to trial. As the trial was progressing and no legally relevant change in circumstances was shown, reconsideration of bail was unwarranted. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:43:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312868 Successive bail applications under Section 439 CrPC were rejected where the applicants relied on parity, alleged weakness in medical evidence, and claimed change in circumstances. The Court held that parity was unavailable because the co-accused had been granted bail on distinct medical and age-related grounds, not on a comparable factual basis. It also held that disputed questions about whether primary evidence had been adduced and whether the medical testimony proved fracture could not be conclusively examined at the bail stage, as those matters belonged to trial. As the trial was progressing and no legally relevant change in circumstances was shown, reconsideration of bail was unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312868