<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450799</link>
    <description>HC quashed assessment order for tax demand related to ITC return discrepancies. Court directed petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax, allowed response to show cause notice, and mandated fresh assessment by tax authority within two months. The ruling emphasized procedural fairness and opportunity to contest tax demand without questioning transaction legitimacy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450799</link>
      <description>HC quashed assessment order for tax demand related to ITC return discrepancies. Court directed petitioner to deposit 10% of disputed tax, allowed response to show cause notice, and mandated fresh assessment by tax authority within two months. The ruling emphasized procedural fairness and opportunity to contest tax demand without questioning transaction legitimacy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>