<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 578 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450797</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order. After the petitioner&#039;s satisfactory response to the initial notice and authorities dropping further proceedings, the subsequent assessment order imposing demands with interest and penalty was quashed. The court found the continued proceedings unsustainable given the earlier acceptance of the petitioner&#039;s explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 578 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450797</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the assessment order. After the petitioner&#039;s satisfactory response to the initial notice and authorities dropping further proceedings, the subsequent assessment order imposing demands with interest and penalty was quashed. The court found the continued proceedings unsustainable given the earlier acceptance of the petitioner&#039;s explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>