<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450787</link>
    <description>The CESTAT New Delhi dismissed an appeal challenging customs valuation enhancement. The appellant imported jackets from Hong Kong and initially declared a lower value in the Bill of Entry. During assessment, the appellant voluntarily accepted enhanced values for five jacket types in a written statement without requesting a hearing. The Joint Commissioner rejected the declared transaction value and redetermined assessable value based on the appellant&#039;s acceptance and contemporaneous e-commerce site data. The tribunal held that once the appellant accepted enhanced valuation, sequential application of valuation rules 4-9 was unnecessary. The appellant&#039;s claim of paying duty under duress was rejected as it wasn&#039;t raised earlier and lacked merit given voluntary payment without objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:42:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450787</link>
      <description>The CESTAT New Delhi dismissed an appeal challenging customs valuation enhancement. The appellant imported jackets from Hong Kong and initially declared a lower value in the Bill of Entry. During assessment, the appellant voluntarily accepted enhanced values for five jacket types in a written statement without requesting a hearing. The Joint Commissioner rejected the declared transaction value and redetermined assessable value based on the appellant&#039;s acceptance and contemporaneous e-commerce site data. The tribunal held that once the appellant accepted enhanced valuation, sequential application of valuation rules 4-9 was unnecessary. The appellant&#039;s claim of paying duty under duress was rejected as it wasn&#039;t raised earlier and lacked merit given voluntary payment without objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>