<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36128</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both appeals as the guarantee letter and agreement to execute a mortgage were found unenforceable due to lack of consideration. The mortgage executed by the 6th defendant was upheld as valid since there was no intention to defraud the revenue, and parties were not given notice of proceedings declaring the mortgage void. Requests for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36128</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both appeals as the guarantee letter and agreement to execute a mortgage were found unenforceable due to lack of consideration. The mortgage executed by the 6th defendant was upheld as valid since there was no intention to defraud the revenue, and parties were not given notice of proceedings declaring the mortgage void. Requests for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>