https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450783 The HC determined that the Appellate Tribunal erred by not recognizing the dual challenge in the appellant's appeal, which contested both the confirmation of the provisional attachment and the rejection of the application for documents. Consequently, the HC set aside the attachment order and reinstated the appellant's application for documents, remitting the matter back to the Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to address the application during the final hearing of the appeal, preserving all parties' rights and contentions. en-us Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:42:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450783 The HC determined that the Appellate Tribunal erred by not recognizing the dual challenge in the appellant's appeal, which contested both the confirmation of the provisional attachment and the rejection of the application for documents. Consequently, the HC set aside the attachment order and reinstated the appellant's application for documents, remitting the matter back to the Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to address the application during the final hearing of the appeal, preserving all parties' rights and contentions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450783