https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450782 CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal in a service tax case involving residential complex service. The appellant, a construction company, was held liable for service tax on construction activities for personal use of customers and faced penalties for failure to file ST-3 returns regularly. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, following precedent from Grandeur Homes Pvt. Ltd. and other similar cases, holding that no service tax is chargeable for construction services provided to individual flat buyers for personal use, both before and after 01.07.2010. The impugned order was set aside. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450782 CESTAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal in a service tax case involving residential complex service. The appellant, a construction company, was held liable for service tax on construction activities for personal use of customers and faced penalties for failure to file ST-3 returns regularly. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, following precedent from Grandeur Homes Pvt. Ltd. and other similar cases, holding that no service tax is chargeable for construction services provided to individual flat buyers for personal use, both before and after 01.07.2010. The impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450782