<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 560 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450779</link>
    <description>Reverse charge liability depends on the service category, the recipient&#039;s statutory coverage, and the applicable notification; where the record does not establish that the supplied service falls within the notified reverse charge entry, the demand cannot stand. On the facts discussed, the demands relating to blasting and painting, consultancy charges, and repair and maintenance were held unsustainable because the supporting documents were not properly verified and the asserted taxable classification was not proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:41:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 560 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450779</link>
      <description>Reverse charge liability depends on the service category, the recipient&#039;s statutory coverage, and the applicable notification; where the record does not establish that the supplied service falls within the notified reverse charge entry, the demand cannot stand. On the facts discussed, the demands relating to blasting and painting, consultancy charges, and repair and maintenance were held unsustainable because the supporting documents were not properly verified and the asserted taxable classification was not proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>