<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450769</link>
    <description>HC found the retrospective GST registration cancellation improper due to lack of clear reasoning and procedural fairness. The court modified the cancellation date from 2017 to 2021, allowing tax authorities to pursue recovery of dues while ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to fair process. The order emphasized that retrospective cancellations must be based on objective criteria and provide adequate notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 550 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450769</link>
      <description>HC found the retrospective GST registration cancellation improper due to lack of clear reasoning and procedural fairness. The court modified the cancellation date from 2017 to 2021, allowing tax authorities to pursue recovery of dues while ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to fair process. The order emphasized that retrospective cancellations must be based on objective criteria and provide adequate notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>