<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450766</link>
    <description>HC addressed a GST assessment dispute involving a plywood dealer challenging an order imposing Rs. 3.16 crore tax liability. The court found procedural discrepancies in tax calculation and allowed the petitioner to file a correction application under Section 161 of GST Act within 90 days. The writ petition was disposed of, providing an opportunity for the dealer to rectify potential assessment errors through proper administrative channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450766</link>
      <description>HC addressed a GST assessment dispute involving a plywood dealer challenging an order imposing Rs. 3.16 crore tax liability. The court found procedural discrepancies in tax calculation and allowed the petitioner to file a correction application under Section 161 of GST Act within 90 days. The writ petition was disposed of, providing an opportunity for the dealer to rectify potential assessment errors through proper administrative channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>