<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 546 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450765</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s rectification applications under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and directed the respondents to refund the taxes paid under protest, along with applicable interest, within two months. The decision was based on the Apex Court&#039;s overruling of the AAR order and a supporting CBDT circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 546 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450765</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s rectification applications under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and directed the respondents to refund the taxes paid under protest, along with applicable interest, within two months. The decision was based on the Apex Court&#039;s overruling of the AAR order and a supporting CBDT circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>