https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312867 A later bail application may be heard by any Judge having the requisite roster jurisdiction; it is desirable, but not mandatory, that a subsequent application go before the Judge who decided the earlier one. The decisive question is whether there is a real risk of absconding, fleeing from justice, or tampering with evidence. On the stated facts, the applicant had local roots, a co-accused had already been granted bail, and no sufficient ground was shown to refuse release. Bail is ordinarily the rule and jail the exception, so the application was allowed and bail was directed. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:04:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312867 A later bail application may be heard by any Judge having the requisite roster jurisdiction; it is desirable, but not mandatory, that a subsequent application go before the Judge who decided the earlier one. The decisive question is whether there is a real risk of absconding, fleeing from justice, or tampering with evidence. On the stated facts, the applicant had local roots, a co-accused had already been granted bail, and no sufficient ground was shown to refuse release. Bail is ordinarily the rule and jail the exception, so the application was allowed and bail was directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312867