<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36123</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the deletion of the unexplained income addition of Rs. 59,205 and the reduction of the penalty to Rs. 1,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1963-64. The Court found the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding the credits to be satisfactory and supported by evidence, concluding that the invocation of section 68 of the Income Tax Act was unwarranted. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both the addition deletion and the penalty reduction issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36123</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the deletion of the unexplained income addition of Rs. 59,205 and the reduction of the penalty to Rs. 1,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1963-64. The Court found the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding the credits to be satisfactory and supported by evidence, concluding that the invocation of section 68 of the Income Tax Act was unwarranted. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on both the addition deletion and the penalty reduction issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>