<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1185 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312857</link>
    <description>Regular bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was considered on parity with co-accused already on bail, the petitioner&#039;s custody of about nine months, and the slow progress of trial with only one witness partly examined out of nine. The Court treated the likely delay in completion of trial as significant and noted that no view was expressed on the merits of the case. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to regular bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1185 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312857</link>
      <description>Regular bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was considered on parity with co-accused already on bail, the petitioner&#039;s custody of about nine months, and the slow progress of trial with only one witness partly examined out of nine. The Court treated the likely delay in completion of trial as significant and noted that no view was expressed on the merits of the case. On that basis, the petitioner was held entitled to regular bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>