<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1258 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312855</link>
    <description>Police custody under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be authorised only within the first fifteen days of remand counted from the Magistrate&#039;s first remand order. After that period expires, further custody must be judicial custody, in light of Article 22 and Sections 57 and 167 of the Code. Because the accused had already been remanded and the impugned order was passed after the fifteen-day period, the Calcutta High Court held that further police custody was contrary to law and set aside the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1258 - CALCUTTA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312855</link>
      <description>Police custody under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be authorised only within the first fifteen days of remand counted from the Magistrate&#039;s first remand order. After that period expires, further custody must be judicial custody, in light of Article 22 and Sections 57 and 167 of the Code. Because the accused had already been remanded and the impugned order was passed after the fifteen-day period, the Calcutta High Court held that further police custody was contrary to law and set aside the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>