<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 832 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312850</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes strict limits on bail, requiring the Public Prosecutor to be heard and, when opposed, the court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail. Mere filing of the charge-sheet does not satisfy these twin conditions. Bail granted to a co-accused on medical grounds does not create an automatic parity claim, and no comparable special ground was shown under the CrPC proviso. Bail was therefore refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 832 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312850</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes strict limits on bail, requiring the Public Prosecutor to be heard and, when opposed, the court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and will not commit an offence while on bail. Mere filing of the charge-sheet does not satisfy these twin conditions. Bail granted to a co-accused on medical grounds does not create an automatic parity claim, and no comparable special ground was shown under the CrPC proviso. Bail was therefore refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>