<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312847</link>
    <description>The SC granted bail to the appellant following a review of the lower courts&#039; decisions, which had denied bail despite some co-accused receiving it. The SC&#039;s decision emphasized the principle of parity in bail matters, ensuring consistent application of legal standards across similarly situated defendants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312847</link>
      <description>The SC granted bail to the appellant following a review of the lower courts&#039; decisions, which had denied bail despite some co-accused receiving it. The SC&#039;s decision emphasized the principle of parity in bail matters, ensuring consistent application of legal standards across similarly situated defendants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>