<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36119</link>
    <description>Extra shift allowance was confined to the proportion of the period during which machinery actually worked double or triple shifts, so full allowance was not admissible. The assessee&#039;s share of loss from an unregistered firm could not be set off against its own business income, and the earlier adverse view was followed. A reasonable portion of common establishment and management expenses was disallowed because it related to another concern and not solely to the assessee&#039;s business. Legal expenses over distribution of profits in specie were also disallowed, as post-earning profit distribution is not expenditure wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 14 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36119</link>
      <description>Extra shift allowance was confined to the proportion of the period during which machinery actually worked double or triple shifts, so full allowance was not admissible. The assessee&#039;s share of loss from an unregistered firm could not be set off against its own business income, and the earlier adverse view was followed. A reasonable portion of common establishment and management expenses was disallowed because it related to another concern and not solely to the assessee&#039;s business. Legal expenses over distribution of profits in specie were also disallowed, as post-earning profit distribution is not expenditure wholly and exclusively for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>