<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening Notice Quashed: Lack of Assessing Officer&#039;s Signature Invalidates Tax Assessment Order.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75625</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening notice - Absence of the manual/digital signature of the A.O in the copy of the Reopening notice - Elaborating on the term &quot;signed&quot;, it was observed that that same was to be construed as giving one&#039;s name to signify assent or adhesion to by signing one&#039;s name; to attest by signing or when a person is unable to write his name then affixation of &quot;mark&quot; by such person. - The Tribunal highlighted significant procedural lapses, notably the absence of the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature on the notice under section 148, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscores the importance of adhering to procedural requirements, emphasizing that such lapses can invalidate otherwise substantive assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:56:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening Notice Quashed: Lack of Assessing Officer&#039;s Signature Invalidates Tax Assessment Order.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75625</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening notice - Absence of the manual/digital signature of the A.O in the copy of the Reopening notice - Elaborating on the term &quot;signed&quot;, it was observed that that same was to be construed as giving one&#039;s name to signify assent or adhesion to by signing one&#039;s name; to attest by signing or when a person is unable to write his name then affixation of &quot;mark&quot; by such person. - The Tribunal highlighted significant procedural lapses, notably the absence of the Assessing Officer&#039;s signature on the notice under section 148, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscores the importance of adhering to procedural requirements, emphasizing that such lapses can invalidate otherwise substantive assessments.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:56:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>