<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 55 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the levy of a penalty of Rs. 3,500 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the partnership firm for concealing income. The Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) was invoked, shifting the burden of proof to the assessee, who failed to provide a credible explanation. The court upheld the penalty, ruling in favor of the revenue and ordering the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:44:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 55 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the levy of a penalty of Rs. 3,500 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the partnership firm for concealing income. The Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) was invoked, shifting the burden of proof to the assessee, who failed to provide a credible explanation. The court upheld the penalty, ruling in favor of the revenue and ordering the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>