<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 523 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was unjustified in invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided substantial evidence supporting the shortage of piped natural gas (PNG), which was verified during the original assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 523 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was unjustified in invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant had provided substantial evidence supporting the shortage of piped natural gas (PNG), which was verified during the original assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s directive for a fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>