<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant by affirming the validity of the Cenvat Credit taken based on invoices from an unregistered dealer, as endorsed correctly. It found no suppression of facts by the Appellant, leading to the confirmed demand being set aside due to limitation, granting consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the Appellant by affirming the validity of the Cenvat Credit taken based on invoices from an unregistered dealer, as endorsed correctly. It found no suppression of facts by the Appellant, leading to the confirmed demand being set aside due to limitation, granting consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>