<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 489 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming that the appellant legitimately availed Cenvat credit based on genuine tax invoices from WCMIL, which showed Excise Duty payments. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant acted with due diligence and was not responsible for verifying WCMIL&#039;s eligibility for credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 489 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s decision, affirming that the appellant legitimately availed Cenvat credit based on genuine tax invoices from WCMIL, which showed Excise Duty payments. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant acted with due diligence and was not responsible for verifying WCMIL&#039;s eligibility for credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>