https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450705 False representation of property title, inducement to pay money, and failure to convey title or refund the amount were treated as sufficient to indicate fraudulent intention from the inception, so the dispute was not confined to a civil or contractual breach and the FIR could not be quashed at the threshold under inherent jurisdiction. The jurisdictional objection also failed because the real estate fraud inquiry fell within the Economic Offences Wing framework applicable to the 2023 registration, making the FIR and investigation legally permissible. Allegations of cheating and allied offences were held to disclose a cognizable criminal case, while the parallel complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not negate those ingredients. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:54:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450705 False representation of property title, inducement to pay money, and failure to convey title or refund the amount were treated as sufficient to indicate fraudulent intention from the inception, so the dispute was not confined to a civil or contractual breach and the FIR could not be quashed at the threshold under inherent jurisdiction. The jurisdictional objection also failed because the real estate fraud inquiry fell within the Economic Offences Wing framework applicable to the 2023 registration, making the FIR and investigation legally permissible. Allegations of cheating and allied offences were held to disclose a cognizable criminal case, while the parallel complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not negate those ingredients. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450705