<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1447 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312845</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh decision by the Special Judge. The parties jointly requested rehearing after all aspects and cited judgments were considered, and the High Court accepted that request. It further clarified that the direction to decide the matter anew should not be treated as any expression on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1447 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312845</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh decision by the Special Judge. The parties jointly requested rehearing after all aspects and cited judgments were considered, and the High Court accepted that request. It further clarified that the direction to decide the matter anew should not be treated as any expression on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>