<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1353 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312842</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed an operational creditor&#039;s appeal challenging a resolution plan that allocated no amount to the appellant. The tribunal found the liquidation value was nil as per Form H submitted by the resolution professional, with even government operational creditors having verified claims of Rs. 295.18 crores receiving nothing. NCLAT held no error existed in the allocation since operational creditors are only entitled to minimum liquidation value under Section 30(2)(b), and no breach of statutory provisions was demonstrated. The appeal was dismissed with no interference warranted in the approved resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1353 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312842</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed an operational creditor&#039;s appeal challenging a resolution plan that allocated no amount to the appellant. The tribunal found the liquidation value was nil as per Form H submitted by the resolution professional, with even government operational creditors having verified claims of Rs. 295.18 crores receiving nothing. NCLAT held no error existed in the allocation since operational creditors are only entitled to minimum liquidation value under Section 30(2)(b), and no breach of statutory provisions was demonstrated. The appeal was dismissed with no interference warranted in the approved resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>