<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36103</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruled that the disallowance of Rs. 12,000 from the managing director&#039;s remuneration was not justified under sections 40(c) and 40A(5)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court clarified the application of the proviso to section 40A(5)(a), emphasizing the maximum deduction limit of Rs. 72,000 for such expenditures. The decision favored the assessee-company, concluding that the disallowance was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:11:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 35 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36103</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruled that the disallowance of Rs. 12,000 from the managing director&#039;s remuneration was not justified under sections 40(c) and 40A(5)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court clarified the application of the proviso to section 40A(5)(a), emphasizing the maximum deduction limit of Rs. 72,000 for such expenditures. The decision favored the assessee-company, concluding that the disallowance was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>