<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1028 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312825</link>
    <description>An exemption scheme for tourism incentives had to be applied according to the charging provision and the scheme&#039;s express terms. The Court held that, for setting off eligible capital investment, only the entertainment-tax component notionally recoverable from the ticket could be adjusted; an administrative circular could not require a notional gross-up or treat the entire ticket value as capital value, so that challenge succeeded. On the extension issue, the scheme fixed a time limit for commencement of commercial operations and later resolutions excluded further enlargement of that period; units that missed the deadline were not entitled to extension or scheme benefits, so that challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:02:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1028 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312825</link>
      <description>An exemption scheme for tourism incentives had to be applied according to the charging provision and the scheme&#039;s express terms. The Court held that, for setting off eligible capital investment, only the entertainment-tax component notionally recoverable from the ticket could be adjusted; an administrative circular could not require a notional gross-up or treat the entire ticket value as capital value, so that challenge succeeded. On the extension issue, the scheme fixed a time limit for commencement of commercial operations and later resolutions excluded further enlargement of that period; units that missed the deadline were not entitled to extension or scheme benefits, so that challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>