<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 477 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450696</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the NFAC&#039;s order under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was remanded for fresh adjudication. The ITAT directed the NFAC to provide three effective opportunities for hearing, requiring the taxpayer to file and substantiate all relevant facts. A 4-day delay was condoned, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 477 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450696</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the NFAC&#039;s order under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was remanded for fresh adjudication. The ITAT directed the NFAC to provide three effective opportunities for hearing, requiring the taxpayer to file and substantiate all relevant facts. A 4-day delay was condoned, emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>