<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450693</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to non-prosecution, citing the absence of supporting documents and the assessee&#039;s repeated non-appearance. The Tribunal upheld the addition under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities, given the discrepancies in payment details and unresolved property ownership issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450693</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to non-prosecution, citing the absence of supporting documents and the assessee&#039;s repeated non-appearance. The Tribunal upheld the addition under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities, given the discrepancies in payment details and unresolved property ownership issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>