<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 465 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. It determined that the Appellant, a trading company, was denied a fair opportunity to present submissions regarding the interception and seizure of goods by Customs Officers. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of natural justice, requiring the Appellant to be heard properly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 19:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 465 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. It determined that the Appellant, a trading company, was denied a fair opportunity to present submissions regarding the interception and seizure of goods by Customs Officers. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of natural justice, requiring the Appellant to be heard properly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>