<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confiscation Upheld: Counterfeit Shoe Imports Labeled as Prohibited Goods, Leading to Penalty for Mis-declaration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75566</link>
    <description>Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR Rules, 2007 - The CESTAT found the goods to be counterfeit, bearing the logo &quot;UCB&quot; without the right holder&#039;s consent, categorizing them as &quot;prohibited goods&quot; under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on the procedure under Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, was dismissed, upholding the confiscation under Section 111(d) and the penalty under Section 112(a)(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confiscation Upheld: Counterfeit Shoe Imports Labeled as Prohibited Goods, Leading to Penalty for Mis-declaration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75566</link>
      <description>Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR Rules, 2007 - The CESTAT found the goods to be counterfeit, bearing the logo &quot;UCB&quot; without the right holder&#039;s consent, categorizing them as &quot;prohibited goods&quot; under the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s challenge based on the procedure under Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007, was dismissed, upholding the confiscation under Section 111(d) and the penalty under Section 112(a)(i).</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:25:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>