<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 461 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450680</link>
    <description>The appellate authority set aside the Rs. 50,000 penalty imposed on the appellant, a Customs Broker, for alleged violations of the CBLR, 2013. The authority found the department&#039;s charges regarding authorization, client credential verification, and employee supervision to be unsubstantiated and overly technical. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was cautioned to ensure compliance with Customs Broker obligations in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 461 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450680</link>
      <description>The appellate authority set aside the Rs. 50,000 penalty imposed on the appellant, a Customs Broker, for alleged violations of the CBLR, 2013. The authority found the department&#039;s charges regarding authorization, client credential verification, and employee supervision to be unsubstantiated and overly technical. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was cautioned to ensure compliance with Customs Broker obligations in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>