<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Overturns Revision Order; Initial Share Subscriber Assessment Deemed Sufficient by Tribunal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75546</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his predecessor - second revision order - assessment has been set aside or de novo assessment - sending of the proposal by the successor-Assessing Officer - Share application money - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers - The appellant argued against the validity of the revision order, stating that the assessment order was passed after proper enquiries and verifications, and subsequent actions by the PCIT were unjustified. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, holding that the subsequent revision order was not sustainable under the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:57:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Overturns Revision Order; Initial Share Subscriber Assessment Deemed Sufficient by Tribunal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75546</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - successor PCIT / CIT did not agree with his predecessor - second revision order - assessment has been set aside or de novo assessment - sending of the proposal by the successor-Assessing Officer - Share application money - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers - The appellant argued against the validity of the revision order, stating that the assessment order was passed after proper enquiries and verifications, and subsequent actions by the PCIT were unjustified. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, holding that the subsequent revision order was not sustainable under the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:57:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>