<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312820</link>
    <description>A police report under the CrPC is complete for cognizance once investigation is otherwise complete and the witnesses have been examined; the absence of the scientific expert&#039;s report does not make the report invalid or prevent cognizance under Section 190(1)(b). The duty to supply documents and the evidentiary treatment of scientific reports do not make expert opinion a condition precedent. On bail, the NDPS Act&#039;s Section 37 restrictions do not curtail the High Court&#039;s special powers under Section 439, because the saving provision in Section 36A(3) preserves that jurisdiction, subject to statutory framework and judicial discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 12:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 408 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312820</link>
      <description>A police report under the CrPC is complete for cognizance once investigation is otherwise complete and the witnesses have been examined; the absence of the scientific expert&#039;s report does not make the report invalid or prevent cognizance under Section 190(1)(b). The duty to supply documents and the evidentiary treatment of scientific reports do not make expert opinion a condition precedent. On bail, the NDPS Act&#039;s Section 37 restrictions do not curtail the High Court&#039;s special powers under Section 439, because the saving provision in Section 36A(3) preserves that jurisdiction, subject to statutory framework and judicial discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>