<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36081</link>
    <description>Estate-duty valuation under the Estate Duty Act turned on four rules: constitutional validity of section 34(1)(c) could not be examined by statutory authorities, so aggregation of lineal descendants&#039; shares for rate purposes was applied; exemption under section 33(1)(n) for a Hindu undivided family residential house was confined to the deceased&#039;s notional share on partition, not the entire house; interest on gifted amounts was includible only if it accrued naturally from the gifted property without the donee&#039;s intervention, so independently earned interest was excluded; and a deceased partner&#039;s share in a firm had to be valued on the firm&#039;s overall assets and liabilities, not by revaluing closing stock alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:17:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36081</link>
      <description>Estate-duty valuation under the Estate Duty Act turned on four rules: constitutional validity of section 34(1)(c) could not be examined by statutory authorities, so aggregation of lineal descendants&#039; shares for rate purposes was applied; exemption under section 33(1)(n) for a Hindu undivided family residential house was confined to the deceased&#039;s notional share on partition, not the entire house; interest on gifted amounts was includible only if it accrued naturally from the gifted property without the donee&#039;s intervention, so independently earned interest was excluded; and a deceased partner&#039;s share in a firm had to be valued on the firm&#039;s overall assets and liabilities, not by revaluing closing stock alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>