<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450620</link>
    <description>Area-based exemption notifications requiring special value addition rates must be applied using the actual figures from audited financial records, not a notional estimate of raw material cost. The prescribed formula called for computation from the preceding financial year&#039;s sale value, deduction of raw materials and packing material consumed, eligible fuel cost, and inventory adjustments. Because the rejection was based on notional raw material costing contrary to the notification, and the statutory auditors&#039; certificate supported the actual value addition, the refusal to fix the special rate was unsustainable. The claimant was entitled to fixation of the special value addition rate at 73.5%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2024 07:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 401 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450620</link>
      <description>Area-based exemption notifications requiring special value addition rates must be applied using the actual figures from audited financial records, not a notional estimate of raw material cost. The prescribed formula called for computation from the preceding financial year&#039;s sale value, deduction of raw materials and packing material consumed, eligible fuel cost, and inventory adjustments. Because the rejection was based on notional raw material costing contrary to the notification, and the statutory auditors&#039; certificate supported the actual value addition, the refusal to fix the special rate was unsustainable. The claimant was entitled to fixation of the special value addition rate at 73.5%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>