<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 25 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36069</link>
    <description>A karta may make valid gifts of HUF movable property to near relatives within reasonable limits out of love and affection; such a gift is not void merely because it is made from HUF funds, though an excessive gift may be voidable at the instance of coparceners. Section 64(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies only to the specified partnership-linked income of a spouse or minor child and does not, by itself, cover ordinary gifts; on the stated facts, it did not apply. Cross-gifts require clear proof of a connected reciprocal arrangement, and they were negatived here because the gifts were unequal, separated in time, and lacked proved interconnection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 25 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36069</link>
      <description>A karta may make valid gifts of HUF movable property to near relatives within reasonable limits out of love and affection; such a gift is not void merely because it is made from HUF funds, though an excessive gift may be voidable at the instance of coparceners. Section 64(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies only to the specified partnership-linked income of a spouse or minor child and does not, by itself, cover ordinary gifts; on the stated facts, it did not apply. Cross-gifts require clear proof of a connected reciprocal arrangement, and they were negatived here because the gifts were unequal, separated in time, and lacked proved interconnection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>