<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 360 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450579</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals against confiscation of copper cathodes and penalties imposed on the appellant and its directors for allegedly mis-declaring country of origin as Zambia instead of Iran. The tribunal held that the department failed to prove the goods originated from Iran or establish the appellant&#039;s willful involvement in issuing false COO certificates. The department conducted an incomplete investigation, not verifying with Iranian entities or Zambian authorities. Without evidence of mens rea or the appellant&#039;s role in alleged mis-declaration, penalties under sections 112(a) and 114AA could not be imposed. The tribunal set aside confiscation orders and all penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:59:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 360 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450579</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals against confiscation of copper cathodes and penalties imposed on the appellant and its directors for allegedly mis-declaring country of origin as Zambia instead of Iran. The tribunal held that the department failed to prove the goods originated from Iran or establish the appellant&#039;s willful involvement in issuing false COO certificates. The department conducted an incomplete investigation, not verifying with Iranian entities or Zambian authorities. Without evidence of mens rea or the appellant&#039;s role in alleged mis-declaration, penalties under sections 112(a) and 114AA could not be imposed. The tribunal set aside confiscation orders and all penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>