<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 356 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450575</link>
    <description>HC dismissed petition challenging provisional attachment of immovable properties under PMLA. Court held that petitioner had alternative appellate remedy under Section 26 of PMLA before Appellate Tribunal. Court noted that any aggrieved person, even if not party to original order, can file appeal under Section 26 read with Rule 2 of Rules 2005. Given availability of statutory appellate remedy, HC declined to entertain writ petition and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=746112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 356 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450575</link>
      <description>HC dismissed petition challenging provisional attachment of immovable properties under PMLA. Court held that petitioner had alternative appellate remedy under Section 26 of PMLA before Appellate Tribunal. Court noted that any aggrieved person, even if not party to original order, can file appeal under Section 26 read with Rule 2 of Rules 2005. Given availability of statutory appellate remedy, HC declined to entertain writ petition and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>