https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450574 Where the predicate criminal case and the consequential money laundering proceedings had already been quashed, the writ challenge to the provisional attachment of the petitioner's property became infructuous and no merits determination was required. However, because the petitioner's property had been wrongly reflected in the attachment-related revenue record, the Sub Registrar was directed to delete the entry concerning the relevant survey number. The decision thus treats the challenge to attachment as spent by the quashing of the underlying proceedings, while ensuring that the mistaken registration entry is removed from the record. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:59:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450574 Where the predicate criminal case and the consequential money laundering proceedings had already been quashed, the writ challenge to the provisional attachment of the petitioner's property became infructuous and no merits determination was required. However, because the petitioner's property had been wrongly reflected in the attachment-related revenue record, the Sub Registrar was directed to delete the entry concerning the relevant survey number. The decision thus treats the challenge to attachment as spent by the quashing of the underlying proceedings, while ensuring that the mistaken registration entry is removed from the record. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450574