https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450572 The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Kolkata, upheld the dismissal of the Appellant's appeal due to a delay exceeding the condonable period outlined under s. 85(3A) of the Act. The appeal was required to be filed within two months, or three months with condonation. The Appellant's failure to file within this timeframe rendered the appeal time-barred and not maintainable, underscoring the criticality of adhering to statutory deadlines and seeking timely condonation for delays in appeal filings. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:59:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450572 The Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT Kolkata, upheld the dismissal of the Appellant's appeal due to a delay exceeding the condonable period outlined under s. 85(3A) of the Act. The appeal was required to be filed within two months, or three months with condonation. The Appellant's failure to file within this timeframe rendered the appeal time-barred and not maintainable, underscoring the criticality of adhering to statutory deadlines and seeking timely condonation for delays in appeal filings. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=450572